“Thunder” Art Print by Josh Keyes (Partial Onsale Info)

Limited Addiction Gallery is set to publish what is, in my opinion, one of Josh Keyes’ greatest pieces ever, “Thunder”.  They will release it as a huge 24″ x 32″ giclee on July 15 for $395 (edition of 100).  They haven’t announced the exact onsale details yet, but you can be sure I’ll keep you posted.  Until then, visit LimitedAddictionGallery.com.

30 Responses to ““Thunder” Art Print by Josh Keyes (Partial Onsale Info)”

  1. 4 bills is pretty pricey–but I agree, possibly the best Keyes print to date.

  2. WOW thats huge! amazing. love this image.

  3. 4 bills, huh? At 24 x 32, I guess that’s about what I’d expect…

  4. yeah thats a good price for how big this is.

  5. Will this be as painful or as the last print sale?

  6. Will this be as painful or more painful than the last print sale?

  7. The price should scare off a few. Hopefully enough to make it a little easier. I gave up the last time around.

  8. totally worth the price tag purely on aesthetics, not to mention the speculation incentives.

  9. oh how i can’t wait to spend another 8 hours at a computer trying to get this.

  10. So you’re saying that contrary to what LAG said after the last sale, it will be more of the same?

  11. I HAVE ACHIEVED A BONER.

  12. What an achievement.

  13. I would loooooove this piece – I would pay the cash and hope that it will scare a few kids of – But as we all know…

    This will be agony and then 6 hours later we end up with ziiiiip
    3 hours later Ebay flipper will have theirs on for $9989

    Dam.

  14. On sale 7/15

  15. I think that this is beautiful, but I couldn’t see myself having it framed and staring at it lovingly for any period of time. I totally see how talented Josh Keyes is, but none of his pieces really connect with me. That’s just my visceral reaction. Maybe I need to see one in person. As it is I look at this piece and think “wow that’s really cool and well done,” but I don’t really like it that much. Do those of you who own some of his pieces love them more in person? They’re all drawn though, right? Does he paint? What’s his story. I’m intrigued, but not a fan.

  16. JENNIFER C, I THINK THAT WAS THE MOST WELL THOUGHT OUT AND ACTUALLY “ABOUT THE ART” COMMENT I HAVE SEEN IN AGES. YOU GET POST OF THE WEEK.

    IN RESPONSE TO YOUR RESPONSE, I HAVE TO AGREE, HE DEFINITELY SEEMS TALENTED, BUT THERE ARE WAY BETTER WORKS OF HIS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN MADE INTO A PRINT, KINDA DISSAPOINTED IT WAS THIS ONE.

  17. I agree, Shamu takes away form the awesome wolves. I don’t want my bedroom looking like a Sea World© promo ad. Plus the colors wouldn’t match my decor.

    That being said. I’m a fan of Keyes’ work. Maybe in the future he’ll use less white background. His art looks a bit redundant sometimes.

  18. Hey thanks FakeLoaf!

    And thanks for your opinions on the piece as well.

    Lucas – I think you’re on point with the white background. Maybe it’s too much negative space of something. Hmmm.

  19. I love this – I love the tail, very clever – Its very clean and sharp.

    His pieces are normally showing the manmade landscape in competition with the natural landscape. Not sure if I can read this. Someone please help, am I missing the point on this ?

    His series before this were stunning, the treadmill with nature and stop signs etc – Now that stuff I adore and would pay $$ for.

    This print for me is great as its Josh Keyes and I would love to own one of his, apart from that the whale tail and the sharp lines are great

    I dont like the 3rd dog for some reason.
    Wow I am going to dog hell.

  20. Sacha, the point is that Shamu is the fishy version of a dog.

  21. Well, they both mammals, right?

  22. I thought the tail was supposed to be like the fake rabbit at those dog racing tracks.

  23. This feels cold, like an examination room at a creepy hospital in the future and i think that this is what happens when digital art is out put on a digital machine. I think that if this was a screen print, painting, or etching the warmth of a hand made print would make it’s way into our perceptions of this image…just sayin

  24. Josh Keyes is not a digital artist. All of his works are painted and drawn with traditional media

  25. I like how people make ridiculous claims about the art without doing any research.

  26. I think it’s great that everything is hand drawn or painted, but i guess my question is, is a digital print the best way to reproduce that image? I am not talking about the original work of art, i think i am just making a comment on the one for sale. Has anyone seen the original painting who could chime in?

  27. I know that I almost always prefer screenprints to giclees. But i have giclees that I like. Now if only I had the money to run around buying original paintings all over the place, le sigh. =)

  28. LAG’s giclees are among the best I’ve ever seen. Very high quality stuff. I don’t think it would be plausible to accurately reproduce his paintings using screen printing.

  29. That’s good to know Stoney – I got a great giclee from noferin and I love it. Different mediums for different pieces.

  30. Really, in response to the people talking about the content of his work, I agree with you that his paintings have become rather redundant, but you have to hand it to the guy for creating such an attention grabbing, well liked, series of work. At this point in time, he is just playing into everyones madness. 400$ /print, 9899$ reposted on ebay. He could probably paint a pretty rock on an asphalt road and sell a hundred at that price. He is pretty awesome, and I would love to own one of his works someday, but enough with the madness. or maybe thats just my jealousy taking over… same thing with Jeremy fish, blah!

Leave a Reply